Every Ameican needs to read this and then demand that Congress take action.
A QUESTION OF
Expert: Obama doc is
‘proof’ – of fraud
Typeface analysis shows
images come from different machines
Posted: June 07, 2011
8:28 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND
The online image of a Hawaiian “Certificate of Live Birth” was trumpeted by the White House when it was released on
April 27 as “proof positive” that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Now an expert in typefaces and typography says it sure was “proof,” but not
of what the White House would have wanted.
Paul Irey, a retired professional typographer with 50 years experience in his
business, says an analysis of the typefaces used in the Barack Obama’s long-form
birth certificate that the White House released on April 27 reveals it
absolutely to be a forgery.
“My analysis proves beyond a doubt that it would be impossible for the
different letters that appear in the Obama birth certificate to have been typed by one
typewriter,” Irey told WND.
“Typewriters in 1961 could not change the size and shape of a letter on the
fly like that,” he said. “This document is definitely a forgery.”
$4.95 today! Get the inside details on what could be
the most serious constitutional crisis in the nation’s history, in “Where’s the
Birth Certificate? The Case That Barack Obama is Not Eligible to be President,”
autographed by Jerome Corsi.
Irey acknowledges that an IBM Selectric typewriter could have produced different
typefaces in a given document, but only if the Selectric ball was changed every
time a different typeface letter was struck which would be unlikely to have been
done to produce the word “Student,” for example, that had two different styles
of the lower case “t.”
“This would have been a cumbersome procedure and the average hospital clerk
typist would have no reason to change typeface with each individual letter in
preparing a birth certificate,” he noted.
(Story continues below)
Additionally, he argued, IBM only
introduced the Selectric in July 1961.
Such machines were in short supply in August 1961, when Obama’s birth
certificate purportedly was prepared by the nurses or clerks at Kapiolani
Hospital, and few government offices could afford to make the switch from manual typewriters to the expensive
top-of-the line Selectric typewriters when they were first introduced.
Irey told WND that he is convinced the Obama birth certificate released by
the White House is a cut-and-paste composite created by using different parts of
presumably authentic birth certificates that had been typed in Hawaii in 1961
on different typewriters.
To prove his point, Irey used as a source document the Xerox copy of the Obama birth
certificate the White House
press staff handed to the press assembled in the White House pressroom on
April 27, as seen in Exhibit 1:
Exhibit 1: Obama long-form
birth certificate given to press April 27,
From this source, Irey extracted individual typed letters and prepared a
chart listing each typed letter in the document, seen in Exhibit 2:
Exhibit 2: Typed letters in
Obama’s long-form birth document
From there, Irey compared different individual letters, producing a chart,
seen here as Exhibit 3, in which the different typefaces used in the document
are evident by comparison:
Exhibit 3: Letter-to-letter
comparison of typeface in Obama
To make the point even clearer, Irey annotated differences in typefaces that
he felt made the argument the Obama birth certificate released by the White
House on April 27 was a composite document constructed by extracting letters as
needed from various authentic 1961 Hawaiian birth certificates that had
originally been typed on different typewriters, as seen in Exhibit 4:
Exhibit 4: Comparison of enlarged letters in
In Exhibit 5, Irey draws his conclusion that the typeface analysis of the
individual letters in the White House-released Obama birth certificate makes
clear the document is a forgery:
Exhibit 5: Selected letter
comparisons in Obama’s documentation
Irey has concluded that the forgers worked from authentic Hawaii birth
certificates from 1961.
“The forgers did not want to make the same mistake Dan Rather made,” he said. “So, they used letters they
picked up from actual 1961 birth certificates, making sure the typeface that
appeared in the document was authentic to the era.”
The mistake, Irey claims, was to use more than one birth certificate from
which to select the letters.
“Even if the typeface was from the period,” he said, “the mistake was to
forget that each typewriter has its own fingerprint. No two typewriters, even of
the same make and model, will type any given letter exactly the same.”
Irey has produced a T-shirt that he feels provides an easily accessible
understanding to his analysis, as seen in Exhibit 6:
It was in 1967 that Irey started Bergan Graphics in Fort Lee, N.J., and the
company at its height had 60 employees working three round-the-clock shifts. It
later operated out of the company office at Marine Plaza in Guttenberg, N.J.,
with a satellite office in Manhattan at 6th Avenue and 31st Street.
Irey was a pioneer in photo typography, working with prestige clients that
included Montgomery Ward and Acme Markets ads for the east coast.
Brochure from Irey’s
In 2007, CBS News anchor Dan Rather lost his job after Internet bloggers
discovered that the typeface on what became known as the “Killian documents” attacking George W. Bush’s Texas Air National Guard service during
the Vietnam War were forgeries because the typeface in the documents was
unavailable in military typewriters in the 1970s.
from the Center for Journalism Ethics at the University of Wisconsin,
in fact, said critics of the Democrats in the 2004 election campaign, outraged
over what they considered fabrications in the documents, “set about proving as
much, pointing to the fact that one of the fonts used in the memos didn’t even
exist when the documents were said to have originated. Others recreated the
exact papers in Microsoft
“The network soon realized its documents couldn’t be verified and admitted
Media wishing to interview Jerome Corsi, please contact WND.
Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., has authored many books, including No. 1
N.Y. Times best-sellers “The Obama Nation” and “Unfit for Command.” Along with
serving as WND’s senior staff reporter, Corsi is a senior managing director at
Gilford Securities, founded in 1979, is a
full-service boutique investment firm headquartered in NYC providing financial
services to institutional and retail clients, from investment banking and equity research to retirement
planning and wealth
management. The views, opinions, positions or strategies of the author
are his alone, and do not necessarily reflect those of Gilford Securities.
Gilford Securities makes no representations as to accuracy, completeness,
currentness, suitability or validity of any information herein and will not be
liable for any errors, omissions, or delays in this information or any losses,
injuries, or damages arising from its display or use.